State of Illinois
92nd General Assembly
Legislation

   [ Search ]   [ PDF text ]   [ Legislation ]   
[ Home ]   [ Back ]   [ Bottom ]


[ Introduced ][ Amendatory Veto Motion 001 ][ Engrossed ]
[ Enrolled ][ Re-enrolled ]


92_SB1046gms

 
                            State of Illinois
                         OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
                      Springfield, Illinois  62706
      George H. Ryan
      GOVERNOR
                                                     August 3, 2001
      To the Honorable Members of
        The Illinois Senate
      92nd General Assembly
          Pursuant to the  authority  vested  in  the  Governor  by
      Article  IV,  Section  9(e)  of  the Illinois Constitution of
      1970, and re-affirmed by the People of the State of  Illinois
      by popular referendum in 1974, and conforming to the standard
      articulated  by  the Illinois Supreme Court in People ex rel.
      Klinger  v.  Howlett,  50  Ill.2d  242  (1972),   Continental
      Illinois  National Bank and Trust Co. v. Zagel, 78 Ill.2d 387
      (1979), People ex rel. City of Canton v.  Crouch,  79  Ill.2d
      356  (1980),  and  County  of Kane v. Carlson, 116 Ill.2d 186
      (1987), that gubernatorial  action  be  consistent  with  the
      fundamental  purposes  and  the  intent of the bill, I hereby
      return Senate Bill 1046, entitled  "AN  ACT  in  relation  to
      property," with my specific recommendations for change.
          Senate   Bill   1046   involves  the  very  detailed  and
      complicated issue  of  insurance  coverages  required  to  be
      provided   to   condominium  associations  in  the  State  of
      Illinois.  The insurance  industry  requested  an  amendatory
      veto  to  correct  what  they  believe  to be minor technical
      errors in the bill.  They have worked with  the  Chicago  Bar
      Association,   the   primary   organization  supporting  this
      legislation, to secure their support for these changes.   The
      three specific recommendations for change that they have made
      are  technical  in  nature and do not change the substance of
      this legislation.
          The first change makes  it  clear  that  the  changes  in
      coverages  are  to  be  made on each condominium  association
      insurance policy during the calendar year 2002 at the time of
      renewal of that policy.  Without this  clarification,  it  is
      possible  that  insurance carriers would have to non-renew or
      cancel their insurance coverages on condominium associations,
      which would be unnecessarily disruptive and clearly  not  the
      intent of the bill sponsors.
          The  second  change  involves  clarification  of  the new
      requirement that condominium association  insurance  coverage
      include  "coverage for municipal building code requirements".
      This phrase  is  ambiguous  and  could  result  in  insurance
      coverages  being substantially different throughout the State
      of Illinois.  The intent of this section is to make sure that
      in the event of a covered loss by a condominium  association,
      the  repairs are made consistent with the applicable building
      code.  Many times, these types of building code upgrades cost
      more than if  the  property  was  restored  to  its  original
      condition.    With  this  change  the insurance coverage will
      recognize the increased cost of construction due to  building
      code requirements.
          The third change removes the provision that would require
      a  sixty-day  notice  to  the  condominium association in the
      event of a  cancellation  of  that  insurance  policy.   This
      section  also  would  require  certain  notifications  to the
      individual condominium owners  under  certain  circumstances.
      This  section  seems to be inconsistent with current Illinois
      law regarding  cancellations  of  these  types  of  insurance
      policies.   Section  5-143.16  of  the Insurance Code already
      covers this area  of  cancellation  of  insurance  coverages.
      Additionally, the condominium association appears to have the
      primary  responsibility  of  notifying  individual members of
      most coverage changes.
          For these reasons, I hereby return Senate  Bill 1046 with
      the following recommendations for change:
          on page 1, by replacing lines 8 and 9 with the following:
               "(a) Required  coverage.   No  policy  of  insurance
               shall  be  issued  or  delivered  to  a  condominium
               association,  and no policy of insurance issued to a
               condominium association shall be renewed, unless the
               insurance coverage under  the  policy  includes  the
 
               following:"; and
          on page 1 by replacing line 18 with the following:
               "the increased costs of construction due to building
               code requirements, at the time the"; and
          on page 5, by deleting line 23 through 30; and
          on  page  5,  line 31, before "Contractors", by inserting
          the following:
               "(i) Certificates of insurance.".
          With  these  changes,  Senate  Bill  1046  will  have  my
      approval.  I respectfully request your concurrence.
                                             Sincerely,
                                             George H. Ryan
                                             GOVERNOR

[ Top ]