[ Search ] [ Legislation ]
[ Home ] [ Back ] [ Bottom ]
[ Engrossed ] |
91_HB2344 LRB9104640RCcd 1 AN ACT to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 by 2 changing Section 115-10.2. 3 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 4 represented in the General Assembly: 5 Section 5. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is 6 amended by changing Section 115-10.2 as follows: 7 (725 ILCS 5/115-10.2) 8 Sec. 115-10.2. Hearsay exceptions; declarant unavailable 9 (a) Definition of unavailability. "Unavailability as a 10 witness" includes situations in which the declarant: 11 (1) is exempted by ruling of the court on the 12 ground of privilege from testifying concerning the 13 subject matter of the declarant's statement; or 14 (2) persists in refusing to testify concerning the 15 subject matter of the declarant's statement despite an 16 order of the court to do so; or 17 (3) testifies to a lack of memory of the subject 18 matter of the declarant's statement; or 19 (4) is unable to be present or to testify at the 20 hearing because of death or then existing physical or 21 mental illness or infirmity; or 22 (5) is absent from the hearing and the proponent of 23 a statement has been unable to procure the declarant's 24 attendance (or in the case of a hearsay exception under 25 subdivision (b)(2), (b)(3), or (b)(4), the declarant's 26 attendance or testimony) by process or other reasonable 27 means. A declarant is not unavailable as a witness if 28 exemption, refusal, claim of lack of memory, inability, 29 or absence is due to the procurement or wrongdoing of the 30 proponent of a statement for the purpose of preventing 31 the witness from attending or testifying. -2- LRB9104640RCcd 1 (b) Hearsay exceptions. The following are not excluded 2 by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a 3 witness: 4 (1) Former testimony. Testimony given as a witness 5 at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, 6 or in a deposition taken in compliance with law in the 7 course of the same or another proceeding, if the party 8 against whom the testimony is now offered, or, in a civil 9 action or proceeding, a predecessor in interest, had an 10 opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony 11 by direct, cross, or redirect examination. 12 (2) Statement under belief of impending death. In 13 a prosecution for first degree murder, second degree 14 murder, involuntary manslaughter, reckless homicide, or 15 drug induced homicide or in a civil action or proceeding, 16 a statement made by a declarant while believing that the 17 declarant's death was imminent, concerning the cause or 18 circumstances of what the declarant believed to be 19 impending death. 20 (3) Statement against interest. A statement that 21 was at the time of its making so far contrary to the 22 declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far 23 tended to subject the declarant to civil or criminal 24 liability, or to render invalid a claim by the declarant 25 against another, that a reasonable person in the 26 declarant's position would not have made the statement 27 unless believing it to be true. A statement tending to 28 expose the declarant to criminal liability and offered to 29 exculpate the accused is not admissible unless 30 corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the 31 trustworthiness of the statement. 32 (4) Statement of personal or family history. (A) A 33 statement concerning the declarant's own birth, adoption, 34 marriage, divorce, legitimacy, relationship by blood, -3- LRB9104640RCcd 1 adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of 2 personal or family history, even though the declarant had 3 no means of acquiring personal knowledge of the matter 4 stated; or (B) a statement concerning the foregoing 5 matters, and death also, of another person, if the 6 declarant was related to the other by blood, adoption, or 7 marriage or was so intimately associated with the other's 8 family as to be likely to have accurate information 9 concerning the matter declared. 10 (5) Other exceptions. A statement not specifically 11 covered by any of the foregoing exceptions but having 12 equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, 13 if the court determines that (A) the statement is offered 14 as evidence of a material fact; (B) the statement is more 15 probative on the point for which it is offered than any 16 other evidence that the proponent can procure through 17 reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purposes of this 18 Section and the interests of justice will best be served 19 by admission of the statement into evidence. However, a 20 statement may not be admitted under this exception unless 21 the proponent of it makes known to the adverse party 22 sufficiently in advance of the trial or hearing to 23 provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to 24 prepare to meet it, the proponent's intention to offer 25 the statement and the particulars of it, including the 26 name and address of the declarant.Admissibility of prior27statements when witness refused to testify despite a28court order to testify.29(a) A statement not specifically covered by any other30hearsay exception but having equivalent circumstantial31guarantees of trustworthiness, is not excluded by the hearsay32rule if the declarant is unavailable as defined in subsection33(c) and if the court determines that:34(1) the statement is offered as evidence of a-4- LRB9104640RCcd 1material fact; and2(2) the statement is more probative on the point3for which it is offered than any other evidence which the4proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and5(3) the general purposes of this Section and the6interests of justice will best be served by admission of7the statement into evidence.8(b) A statement may not be admitted under this exception9unless the proponent of it makes known to the adverse party10sufficiently in advance of the trial or hearing to provide11the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet12it, the proponent's intention to offer the statement, and the13particulars of the statement, including the name and address14of the declarant.15(c) Unavailability as a witness is limited to the16situation in which the declarant persists in refusing to17testify concerning the subject matter of the declarant's18statement despite an order of the court to do so.19(d) A declarant is not unavailable as a witness if20exemption, refusal, claim or lack of memory, inability or21absence is due to the procurement or wrongdoing of the22proponent of a statement for purpose of preventing the23witness from attending or testifying.24(e) Nothing in this Section shall render a prior25statement inadmissible for purposes of impeachment because26the statement was not recorded or otherwise fails to meet the27criteria set forth in this Section.28 (Source: P.A. 89-689, eff. 12-31-96.)