State of Illinois
90th General Assembly
Legislation

   [ Search ]   [ Legislation ]   [ Bill Summary ]
[ Home ]   [ Back ]   [ Bottom ]



90_SB1731

      735 ILCS 5/2-109          from Ch. 110, par. 2-109
      735 ILCS 5/2-1113         from Ch. 110, par. 2-1113
          Amends the Code  of  Civil  Procedure.   In  headings  of
      Sections  relating  to  malicious  prosecution  and  res ipsa
      loquitur  in  medical  malpractice  cases,  changes  "medical
      malpractice" to "healing art malpractice".
                                                     LRB9000261WHmg
                                               LRB9000261WHmg
 1        AN ACT to amend the Code of Civil Procedure  by  changing
 2    Sections 2-109 and 2-1113.
 3        Be  it  enacted  by  the People of the State of Illinois,
 4    represented in the General Assembly:
 5        Section 5.  The Code of Civil  Procedure  is  amended  by
 6    changing Sections 2-109 and 2-1113 as follows:
 7        (735 ILCS 5/2-109) (from Ch. 110, par. 2-109)
 8        Sec.  2-109.  Malicious prosecution - healing art Medical
 9    malpractice. In  all  cases  alleging  malicious  prosecution
10    arising  out of proceedings which sought damages for injuries
11    or death by reason of medical hospital or other  healing  art
12    malpractice,  the  plaintiff  need not plead or prove special
13    injury to sustain his or her cause of  action.  In  all  such
14    cases   alleging   malicious  prosecution,  no  exemplary  or
15    punitive damages shall be allowed.
16    (Source: P.A. 84-1308.)
17        (735 ILCS 5/2-1113) (from Ch. 110, par. 2-1113)
18        Sec. 2-1113.  Healing art Medical malpractice - res  ipsa
19    loquitur.    In  all  cases  of  alleged  medical  or  dental
20    malpractice,  where the plaintiff relies upon the doctrine of
21    res ipsa loquitur, the court  shall  determine  whether  that
22    doctrine  applies.   In  making that determination, the court
23    shall rely upon either the common knowledge of laymen, if  it
24    determines  that  to  be  adequate,  or  upon  expert medical
25    testimony, that the medical result complained  of  would  not
26    have  ordinarily occurred in the absence of negligence on the
27    part of the defendant.  Proof of an  unusual,  unexpected  or
28    untoward  medical  result  which ordinarily does not occur in
29    the absence of negligence will suffice in the application  of
30    the doctrine.
                            -2-                LRB9000261WHmg
 1    (Source: P.A. 82-783.)

[ Top ]