|
|
|
SB1609 Engrossed |
- 2 - |
LRB096 08932 JAM 19069 b |
|
|
| 1 |
| The State construction agency shall include the following |
| 2 |
| criteria in every
Phase I
evaluation of design-build entities: |
| 3 |
| (1) experience of personnel; (2)
successful
experience with |
| 4 |
| similar project types; (3) financial capability; (4) |
| 5 |
| timeliness
of past performance; (5) experience with similarly |
| 6 |
| sized projects; (6)
successful reference checks of the firm; |
| 7 |
| (7) commitment to assign personnel
for the duration of the |
| 8 |
| project and qualifications of the entity's consultants; and (8) |
| 9 |
| ability or past performance in meeting or exhausting good faith |
| 10 |
| efforts to meet the utilization goals for business enterprises |
| 11 |
| established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, |
| 12 |
| Females, and Persons with Disabilities Act and with Section |
| 13 |
| 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
The State construction |
| 14 |
| agency may include any additional relevant criteria in
Phase I |
| 15 |
| that
it deems necessary for a proper qualification review.
|
| 16 |
| The State construction agency may not consider any |
| 17 |
| design-build entity for
evaluation or
award if the entity has |
| 18 |
| any pecuniary interest in the project or has other
|
| 19 |
| relationships or circumstances, including but not limited to, |
| 20 |
| long-term
leasehold, mutual performance, or development |
| 21 |
| contracts with the State
construction agency,
that may give the |
| 22 |
| design-build entity a financial or tangible advantage over
|
| 23 |
| other design-build entities in the preparation, evaluation, or |
| 24 |
| performance of
the
design-build contract or that create the |
| 25 |
| appearance of impropriety.
No proposal shall be considered that |
| 26 |
| does not include an entity's plan to comply with the |
|
|
|
SB1609 Engrossed |
- 3 - |
LRB096 08932 JAM 19069 b |
|
|
| 1 |
| requirements established in the Business Enterprise for |
| 2 |
| Minorities, Females, and Persons with Disabilities Act, for |
| 3 |
| both the design and construction areas of performance, and with |
| 4 |
| Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
|
| 5 |
| Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation, the |
| 6 |
| State construction
agency shall
create a shortlist of the most |
| 7 |
| highly qualified design-build entities. The
State
construction |
| 8 |
| agency, in its discretion, is not required to shortlist the
|
| 9 |
| maximum number of
entities as identified for Phase II |
| 10 |
| evaluation, provided however, no less than
2
design-build |
| 11 |
| entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit Phase II
|
| 12 |
| proposals.
|
| 13 |
| The State construction agency shall notify the entities |
| 14 |
| selected for the
shortlist in
writing. This notification shall |
| 15 |
| commence the period for the preparation of the
Phase II |
| 16 |
| technical and cost evaluations. The State construction agency |
| 17 |
| must
allow sufficient
time for the shortlist entities to |
| 18 |
| prepare their Phase II submittals
considering
the scope and |
| 19 |
| detail requested by the State agency.
|
| 20 |
| (c) The State construction agency shall include in the |
| 21 |
| request for proposal
the
evaluating factors to be used in the |
| 22 |
| technical and cost submission components
of Phase II. Each |
| 23 |
| request for proposal shall establish, for both the technical
|
| 24 |
| and cost submission components of Phase II, the relative |
| 25 |
| importance assigned to
each evaluation factor and subfactor, |
| 26 |
| including any weighting of criteria to be
employed by the State |
|
|
|
SB1609 Engrossed |
- 4 - |
LRB096 08932 JAM 19069 b |
|
|
| 1 |
| construction agency. The State construction agency must
|
| 2 |
| maintain a record of the
evaluation scoring to be disclosed in |
| 3 |
| event of a protest regarding the
solicitation.
|
| 4 |
| The State construction agency shall include the following |
| 5 |
| criteria in every
Phase II
technical evaluation of design-build |
| 6 |
| entities: (1) compliance with objectives
of
the
project; (2) |
| 7 |
| compliance of proposed services to the request for proposal
|
| 8 |
| requirements; (3) quality of products or materials proposed; |
| 9 |
| (4) quality of
design parameters; (5) design concepts; (6) |
| 10 |
| innovation in meeting the scope and
performance criteria; and |
| 11 |
| (7) constructability of the
proposed project. The State |
| 12 |
| construction agency may include any additional
relevant
|
| 13 |
| technical evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper |
| 14 |
| selection.
|
| 15 |
| The State construction agency shall include the following |
| 16 |
| criteria in every
Phase II cost
evaluation: the total project |
| 17 |
| cost, the construction costs, and the time of
completion. The |
| 18 |
| State construction agency may include any additional relevant
|
| 19 |
| technical
evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper |
| 20 |
| selection. The total project cost criteria weighing factor |
| 21 |
| shall be 25%.
|
| 22 |
| The State construction agency shall directly employ or |
| 23 |
| retain a licensed
design
professional to evaluate the technical |
| 24 |
| and cost submissions to determine if the
technical submissions |
| 25 |
| are in accordance with generally
accepted industry standards.
|
| 26 |
| Upon completion of the technical submissions and cost |