| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | AN ACT concerning finance.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | represented in the General Assembly:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Section 5. The Downstate Public Transportation Act is | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | amended by adding Sections 2-19, 3-9.5, and 4-6 as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | (30 ILCS 740/2-19 new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Sec. 2-19. Design-build authorization. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | (a) In connection with two-phase design-build selection | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | procedures authorized in this Section, a participant may | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | authorize, by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the then | |||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | members of its governing body, the use of competitive selection | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | and the prequalification of responsible bidders consistent | |||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | with applicable federal regulations and this Section. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | (b) Two-phase design-build selection procedures shall
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | consist of the following: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | (1) A participant shall develop, through
licensed | |||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | architects or licensed engineers, a scope of work statement | |||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | for inclusion in the solicitation for phase-one proposals | |||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | that defines the project and provides prospective offerors | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | with sufficient information regarding the participant's | |||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | requirements. The statement shall include criteria and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | preliminary design, and general budget parameters and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | general schedule or delivery requirements to enable the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | offerors to submit proposals which meet the participant's | ||||||
2 | needs. When the two-phase design-build selection procedure | ||||||
3 | is used and the participant contracts for development of | ||||||
4 | the scope of work statement, the participant shall contract | ||||||
5 | for architectural or engineering services as defined by and | ||||||
6 | in accordance with the Architectural, Engineering, and | ||||||
7 | Land Surveying Qualifications Based Selection Act and all | ||||||
8 | applicable licensing statutes. | ||||||
9 | (2) The evaluation factors to be used in
evaluating | ||||||
10 | phase-one proposals must be stated in the solicitation and | ||||||
11 | must include specialized experience and technical | ||||||
12 | competence, capability to perform, past performance of the | ||||||
13 | offeror's team (including the architect-engineer and | ||||||
14 | construction members of the team) and other appropriate | ||||||
15 | technical and qualifications factors. Each solicitation | ||||||
16 | must establish the relative importance assigned to the | ||||||
17 | evaluation factors and the subfactors that must be | ||||||
18 | considered in the evaluation of phase-one proposals on the | ||||||
19 | basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the | ||||||
20 | solicitation. Each design-build team must include a | ||||||
21 | licensed design professional independent from the | ||||||
22 | participant's licensed architect or engineer and a | ||||||
23 | licensed design professional must be named in the phase-one | ||||||
24 | proposals submitted to the participant. | ||||||
25 | (3) On the basis of the phase-one proposal the
| ||||||
26 | participant shall select as the most highly qualified the |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | number of offerors specified in the solicitation and | ||||||
2 | request the selected offerors to submit phase-two | ||||||
3 | competitive proposals and cost or price information. Each | ||||||
4 | solicitation must establish the relative importance | ||||||
5 | assigned to the evaluation factors and the subfactors that | ||||||
6 | must be considered in the evaluation of phase-two proposals | ||||||
7 | on the basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the | ||||||
8 | solicitation. A participant may negotiate with the | ||||||
9 | selected design-build team after award but prior to | ||||||
10 | contract execution for the purpose of securing better terms | ||||||
11 | than originally proposed, provided the salient features of | ||||||
12 | the design-build solicitation are not diminished. Each | ||||||
13 | phase-two solicitation evaluates separately (A) the | ||||||
14 | technical submission for the proposal, including design | ||||||
15 | concepts or proposed solutions to requirements addressed | ||||||
16 | within the scope of work, and (B) the evaluation factors | ||||||
17 | and subfactors, including cost or price, that must be | ||||||
18 | considered in the evaluations of proposals. | ||||||
19 | (4) A design-build solicitation issued under the
| ||||||
20 | procedures in this Section shall state the maximum number | ||||||
21 | of offerors that are to be selected to submit competitive | ||||||
22 | phase-two proposals. The maximum number specified in the | ||||||
23 | solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the participant with | ||||||
24 | respect to an individual solicitation determines that a | ||||||
25 | specified number greater than 5 is in the best interest of | ||||||
26 | the participant and is consistent with the purposes and |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | objectives of the two-phase design-build selection | ||||||
2 | process. | ||||||
3 | (5) All designs submitted as part of the
two-phase | ||||||
4 | selection process and not selected shall be proprietary to | ||||||
5 | the preparers. | ||||||
6 | (30 ILCS 740/3-9.5 new) | ||||||
7 | Sec. 3-9.5. Design-build authorization. | ||||||
8 | (a) In connection with two-phase design-build selection | ||||||
9 | procedures authorized in this Section, a participant may | ||||||
10 | authorize, by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the then | ||||||
11 | members of its governing body, the use of competitive selection | ||||||
12 | and the prequalification of responsible bidders consistent | ||||||
13 | with applicable federal regulations and this Section. | ||||||
14 | (b) Two-phase design-build selection procedures shall
| ||||||
15 | consist of the following: | ||||||
16 | (1) A participant shall develop, through
licensed | ||||||
17 | architects or licensed engineers, a scope of work statement | ||||||
18 | for inclusion in the solicitation for phase-one proposals | ||||||
19 | that defines the project and provides prospective offerors | ||||||
20 | with sufficient information regarding the participant's | ||||||
21 | requirements. The statement shall include criteria and | ||||||
22 | preliminary design, and general budget parameters and | ||||||
23 | general schedule or delivery requirements to enable the | ||||||
24 | offerors to submit proposals which meet the participant's | ||||||
25 | needs. When the two-phase design-build selection procedure |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | is used and the participant contracts for development of | ||||||
2 | the scope of work statement, the participant shall contract | ||||||
3 | for architectural or engineering services as defined by and | ||||||
4 | in accordance with the Architectural, Engineering, and | ||||||
5 | Land Surveying Qualifications Based Selection Act and all | ||||||
6 | applicable licensing statutes. | ||||||
7 | (2) The evaluation factors to be used in
evaluating | ||||||
8 | phase-one proposals must be stated in the solicitation and | ||||||
9 | must include specialized experience and technical | ||||||
10 | competence, capability to perform, past performance of the | ||||||
11 | offeror's team (including the architect-engineer and | ||||||
12 | construction members of the team) and other appropriate | ||||||
13 | technical and qualifications factors. Each solicitation | ||||||
14 | must establish the relative importance assigned to the | ||||||
15 | evaluation factors and the subfactors that must be | ||||||
16 | considered in the evaluation of phase-one proposals on the | ||||||
17 | basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the | ||||||
18 | solicitation. Each design-build team must include a | ||||||
19 | licensed design professional independent from the | ||||||
20 | participant's licensed architect or engineer and a | ||||||
21 | licensed design professional must be named in the phase-one | ||||||
22 | proposals submitted to the participant. | ||||||
23 | (3) On the basis of the phase-one proposal the
| ||||||
24 | participant shall select as the most highly qualified the | ||||||
25 | number of offerors specified in the solicitation and | ||||||
26 | request the selected offerors to submit phase-two |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | competitive proposals and cost or price information. Each | ||||||
2 | solicitation must establish the relative importance | ||||||
3 | assigned to the evaluation factors and the subfactors that | ||||||
4 | must be considered in the evaluation of phase-two proposals | ||||||
5 | on the basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the | ||||||
6 | solicitation. A participant may negotiate with the | ||||||
7 | selected design-build team after award but prior to | ||||||
8 | contract execution for the purpose of securing better terms | ||||||
9 | than originally proposed, provided the salient features of | ||||||
10 | the design-build solicitation are not diminished. Each | ||||||
11 | phase-two solicitation evaluates separately (A) the | ||||||
12 | technical submission for the proposal, including design | ||||||
13 | concepts or proposed solutions to requirements addressed | ||||||
14 | within the scope of work, and (B) the evaluation factors | ||||||
15 | and subfactors, including cost or price, that must be | ||||||
16 | considered in the evaluations of proposals. | ||||||
17 | (4) A design-build solicitation issued under the
| ||||||
18 | procedures in this Section shall state the maximum number | ||||||
19 | of offerors that are to be selected to submit competitive | ||||||
20 | phase-two proposals. The maximum number specified in the | ||||||
21 | solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the participant with | ||||||
22 | respect to an individual solicitation determines that a | ||||||
23 | specified number greater than 5 is in the best interest of | ||||||
24 | the participant and is consistent with the purposes and | ||||||
25 | objectives of the two-phase design-build selection | ||||||
26 | process. |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (5) All designs submitted as part of the
two-phase | ||||||
2 | selection process and not selected shall be proprietary to | ||||||
3 | the preparers. | ||||||
4 | (30 ILCS 740/4-6 new) | ||||||
5 | Sec. 4-6. Design-build authorization. | ||||||
6 | (a) In connection with two-phase design-build selection | ||||||
7 | procedures authorized in this Section, a participant may | ||||||
8 | authorize, by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the then | ||||||
9 | members of its governing body, the use of competitive selection | ||||||
10 | and the prequalification of responsible bidders consistent | ||||||
11 | with applicable federal regulations and this Section. | ||||||
12 | (b) Two-phase design-build selection procedures shall
| ||||||
13 | consist of the following: | ||||||
14 | (1) A participant shall develop, through
licensed | ||||||
15 | architects or licensed engineers, a scope of work statement | ||||||
16 | for inclusion in the solicitation for phase-one proposals | ||||||
17 | that defines the project and provides prospective offerors | ||||||
18 | with sufficient information regarding the participant's | ||||||
19 | requirements. The statement shall include criteria and | ||||||
20 | preliminary design, and general budget parameters and | ||||||
21 | general schedule or delivery requirements to enable the | ||||||
22 | offerors to submit proposals which meet the participant's | ||||||
23 | needs. When the two-phase design-build selection procedure | ||||||
24 | is used and the participant contracts for development of | ||||||
25 | the scope of work statement, the participant shall contract |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | for architectural or engineering services as defined by and | ||||||
2 | in accordance with the Architectural, Engineering, and | ||||||
3 | Land Surveying Qualifications Based Selection Act and all | ||||||
4 | applicable licensing statutes. | ||||||
5 | (2) The evaluation factors to be used in
evaluating | ||||||
6 | phase-one proposals must be stated in the solicitation and | ||||||
7 | must include specialized experience and technical | ||||||
8 | competence, capability to perform, past performance of the | ||||||
9 | offeror's team (including the architect-engineer and | ||||||
10 | construction members of the team) and other appropriate | ||||||
11 | technical and qualifications factors. Each solicitation | ||||||
12 | must establish the relative importance assigned to the | ||||||
13 | evaluation factors and the subfactors that must be | ||||||
14 | considered in the evaluation of phase-one proposals on the | ||||||
15 | basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the | ||||||
16 | solicitation. Each design-build team must include a | ||||||
17 | licensed design professional independent from the | ||||||
18 | participant's licensed architect or engineer and a | ||||||
19 | licensed design professional must be named in the phase-one | ||||||
20 | proposals submitted to the participant. | ||||||
21 | (3) On the basis of the phase-one proposal the
| ||||||
22 | participant shall select as the most highly qualified the | ||||||
23 | number of offerors specified in the solicitation and | ||||||
24 | request the selected offerors to submit phase-two | ||||||
25 | competitive proposals and cost or price information. Each | ||||||
26 | solicitation must establish the relative importance |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | assigned to the evaluation factors and the subfactors that | ||||||
2 | must be considered in the evaluation of phase-two proposals | ||||||
3 | on the basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the | ||||||
4 | solicitation. A participant may negotiate with the | ||||||
5 | selected design-build team after award but prior to | ||||||
6 | contract execution for the purpose of securing better terms | ||||||
7 | than originally proposed, provided the salient features of | ||||||
8 | the design-build solicitation are not diminished. Each | ||||||
9 | phase-two solicitation evaluates separately (A) the | ||||||
10 | technical submission for the proposal, including design | ||||||
11 | concepts or proposed solutions to requirements addressed | ||||||
12 | within the scope of work, and (B) the evaluation factors | ||||||
13 | and subfactors, including cost or price, that must be | ||||||
14 | considered in the evaluations of proposals. | ||||||
15 | (4) A design-build solicitation issued under the
| ||||||
16 | procedures in this Section shall state the maximum number | ||||||
17 | of offerors that are to be selected to submit competitive | ||||||
18 | phase-two proposals. The maximum number specified in the | ||||||
19 | solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the participant with | ||||||
20 | respect to an individual solicitation determines that a | ||||||
21 | specified number greater than 5 is in the best interest of | ||||||
22 | the participant and is consistent with the purposes and | ||||||
23 | objectives of the two-phase design-build selection | ||||||
24 | process. | ||||||
25 | (5) All designs submitted as part of the
two-phase | ||||||
26 | selection process and not selected shall be proprietary to |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | the preparers.
| ||||||
2 | Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | ||||||
3 | becoming law.
|