| ||||
Public Act 099-0874 | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
AN ACT concerning the Law Enforcement Information Task | ||||
Force Act.
| ||||
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| ||||
represented in the General Assembly:
| ||||
Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Law | ||||
Enforcement Information Task Force Act. | ||||
Section 5. Task Force; purpose. There shall be created a | ||||
Law Enforcement Information Task Force to study and make | ||||
recommendations regarding criminal discovery and law | ||||
enforcement information sharing. | ||||
Section 10. Members. | ||||
(a) The Task Force shall consist of the following members | ||||
who will not be compensated: | ||||
(1) the Director of the Administrative Office of the | ||||
Illinois Courts, or his or her designee; | ||||
(2) the Attorney General, or his or her designee; | ||||
(3) the Director of State Police, or his or her | ||||
designee; | ||||
(3.5) the Secretary of the Department of Innovation and | ||||
Technology, or his or her designee; | ||||
(4) a State's Attorney from a county with more than | ||||
3,000,000 residents, or his or her designee; |
(5) a public defender from a county with more than | ||
3,000,000 residents, or his or her designee; | ||
(6) a representative of the Office of the State's | ||
Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor; | ||
(7) a representative of the Office of the State | ||
Appellate Defender; | ||
(8) a representative of the Illinois State's Attorneys | ||
Association, appointed by the Governor; | ||
(9) a representative of the Illinois Public Defender | ||
Association, appointed by the Governor; | ||
(10) a representative from the Illinois Judges | ||
Association, appointed by the Speaker of the House of | ||
Representatives; | ||
(11) a representative from the Illinois State Bar | ||
Association, appointed by the Minority Leader of the House | ||
of Representatives; | ||
(12) a representative of the Chicago Bar Association, | ||
appointed by the Senate President; | ||
(13) a representative from the Illinois Sheriffs' | ||
Association, appointed by the Senate Minority Leader; | ||
(14) a representative from the Illinois Association of | ||
Chiefs of Police, appointed by the Governor; | ||
(15) the chief of police from a municipality with more | ||
than 1,000,000 residents, or his or her designee; | ||
(16) the sheriff from a county with more than 3,000,000 | ||
residents, or his or her designee; and |
(17) the Director of the Illinois Criminal Justice | ||
Information Authority, or his or her designee. | ||
(b) The Law Enforcement Information Task Force shall be | ||
established within the Illinois Criminal Justice Information | ||
Authority and the Illinois Criminal Justice Information | ||
Authority shall serve as the technology and policy advisor to | ||
assist the Task Force. The Illinois Criminal Justice | ||
Information Authority shall work with State and local criminal | ||
justice agencies to promote information sharing systems | ||
through its access to technical expertise and its grant-making | ||
powers for technology information projects. The Illinois | ||
Criminal Justice Information Authority shall provide staff to | ||
serve as a liaison between the Law Enforcement Information Task | ||
Force and its stakeholders to provide guidance in criminal | ||
justice information sharing, best practices and strategies, | ||
and to effectuate the mission of the Task Force. | ||
(c) The members of the Task Force shall elect a chair of | ||
the Task Force. The chair of the Task Force shall convene the | ||
first meeting of the Task Force on or before August 31, 2016. | ||
The Task Force shall meet at least twice a month thereafter | ||
until it completes its duties under this Act, or until December | ||
31, 2016, whichever is earlier. | ||
Section 15. Duties of the Task Force.
| ||
(a) The Task Force may consult with experts to provide | ||
assistance as necessary. |
(b) The Task Force shall: | ||
(1) analyze the criminal discovery process in this | ||
State to determine the actual costs, including, but not | ||
limited to, labor, materials, time, and other tangible | ||
costs of the current criminal discovery process to | ||
determine how technology can improve the process for all | ||
participants; | ||
(2) analyze the process for information sharing, | ||
including, but not limited to, an analysis of record | ||
management systems, computer aided dispatch systems, and | ||
other technology used to process information between law | ||
enforcement agencies in this State to determine the actual | ||
costs of the current process; | ||
(3) analyze the current information sharing process | ||
between law enforcement agencies to determine how | ||
technology can improve the process for all participants; | ||
(4) determine which prosecutors' offices obtain all | ||
law enforcement discoverable evidence in an electronic | ||
format, which prosecutors' offices will soon be able to | ||
obtain all law enforcement discoverable evidence in an | ||
electronic format, and which prosecutors' offices will not | ||
have that ability at any point in the future without | ||
assistance; | ||
(5) determine the barriers for those prosecutors' | ||
offices that will not be able to obtain law enforcement | ||
discoverable evidence in an electronic format without |
assistance; | ||
(6) determine which law enforcement agencies obtain | ||
and utilize data entirely, or partially, in an electronic | ||
format, which law enforcement agencies will soon be able to | ||
obtain and utilize data entirely in an electronic format, | ||
and which law enforcement agencies will not be able to | ||
obtain and utilize data entirely in an electronic format at | ||
any point in the future without assistance; | ||
(7) study how a single statewide criminal information | ||
sharing system or other technology may improve electronic | ||
discovery or electronic redaction; | ||
(8) study how a statewide standardized law enforcement | ||
reporting form that can be easily redacted may improve the | ||
criminal discovery process; | ||
(9) study the short-term needs for law enforcement | ||
agencies and State's Attorneys to facilitate greater use of | ||
electronic discovery and information sharing; | ||
(10) study whether a single standardized statewide | ||
case record management system or other law enforcement | ||
technology would provide better and additional access to | ||
information for law enforcement; | ||
(11) determine whether a single standardized statewide | ||
case record management system or other electronic | ||
discovery technology would provide for a better and more | ||
efficient criminal discovery process and offer any cost | ||
savings; |
(12) determine whether a single standardized statewide | ||
case record management system or other information sharing | ||
technology would provide for a better and more efficient | ||
law enforcement information sharing process and offer any | ||
cost savings; | ||
(13) suggest an alternative funding process to the | ||
State's current method to pay for criminal discovery costs; | ||
(14) suggest an alternative funding process to the | ||
State's current method to pay for law enforcement | ||
information sharing costs; | ||
(15) determine which executive branch agency, judicial | ||
branch agency, or quasi-governmental organization is best | ||
suited to serve as a conduit and coordinator for a | ||
statewide criminal electronic discovery system; and | ||
(16) determine which executive branch agency, judicial | ||
branch agency, or quasi-governmental organization is best | ||
suited to serve as a conduit and coordinator for a | ||
statewide criminal information sharing system. | ||
Section 20. Preliminary and final report. | ||
(a) The Task Force shall provide a preliminary report to | ||
the Governor and General Assembly on or before December 15, | ||
2016, if the final report is not completed by then. | ||
(b) The Task Force shall issue a final report to the | ||
Governor and General Assembly on or before January 15, 2017. | ||
The report shall include recommendations for legislation, use |
of technology, and other non-legislative processes that would | ||
improve the criminal discovery process and law enforcement | ||
information sharing.
| ||
Section 25. Repeal. This Act is repealed on February 1, | ||
2017. | ||
Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | ||
becoming law. |