| ||||
Public Act 097-0349 | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
AN ACT concerning local government.
| ||||
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| ||||
represented in the General Assembly:
| ||||
Section 5. The Park District Code is amended by adding | ||||
Sections 8-50, 8-51, 8-52, 8-53, 8-54, 8-55, 8-56, and 8-57 as | ||||
follows: | ||||
(70 ILCS 1205/8-50 new) | ||||
Sec. 8-50. Definitions. For the purposes of Sections 8-50 | ||||
through 8-57, the following terms shall have the following | ||||
meanings, unless the context requires a different meaning: | ||||
"Delivery system" means the design and construction | ||||
approach used to develop and construct a project. | ||||
"Design-bid-build" means the traditional delivery system | ||||
used on public projects that incorporates the Local Government | ||||
Professional Services Selection Act and the principles of | ||||
competitive selection. | ||||
"Design-build" means a delivery system that provides | ||||
responsibility within a single contract for the furnishing of | ||||
architecture, engineering, land surveying, and related | ||||
services as required, and the labor, materials, equipment, and | ||||
other construction services for the project. | ||||
"Design-build contract" means a contract for a public | ||||
project under this Act between any park district and a |
design-build entity to furnish architecture, engineering, land | ||
surveying, landscape architecture, and related services as | ||
required, and to furnish the labor, materials, equipment, and | ||
other construction services for the project. The design-build | ||
contract may be conditioned upon subsequent refinements in | ||
scope and price and may allow the park district to make | ||
modifications in the project scope without invalidating the | ||
design-build contract. | ||
"Design-build entity" means any individual, sole | ||
proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | ||
professional corporation, or other entity that proposes to | ||
design and construct any public project under this Act. A | ||
design-build entity and associated design-build professionals | ||
shall conduct themselves in accordance with the laws of this | ||
State and the related provisions of the Illinois Administrative | ||
Code, as referenced by the licensed design professionals Acts | ||
of this State. | ||
"Design professional" means any individual, sole | ||
proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | ||
professional corporation, or other entity that offers services | ||
under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of 1989, the | ||
Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the Structural | ||
Engineering Practice Act of 1989, or the Illinois Professional | ||
Land Surveyor Act of 1989. | ||
"Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the | ||
separate phases of the selection process for design-build |
proposals as defined in this Act and may include the | ||
specialized experience, technical qualifications and | ||
competence, capacity to perform, past performance, experience | ||
with similar projects, assignment of personnel to the project, | ||
and other appropriate factors. Price may not be used as a | ||
factor in the evaluation of Phase I proposals. | ||
"Landscape architect design professional" means any | ||
person, sole proprietorship, or entity including, but not | ||
limited to, a partnership, professional service corporation, | ||
or corporation that offers services under the Illinois | ||
Landscape Architecture Act of 1989. | ||
"Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build | ||
contract as submitted by a design-build entity in accordance | ||
with this Act. | ||
"Request for proposal" means the document used by the park | ||
district to solicit proposals for a design-build contract. | ||
"Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements | ||
for the public project, including, but not limited to: the | ||
intended usage, capacity, size, scope, quality, and | ||
performance standards; life-cycle costs; and other | ||
programmatic criteria that are expressed in performance | ||
oriented and quantifiable specifications and drawings that can | ||
be reasonably inferred and are suited to allow a design-build | ||
entity to develop a proposal. | ||
(70 ILCS 1205/8-51 new) |
Sec. 8-51. Authorization for design-build; advertisement. | ||
(a) A park district shall have the power to enter into | ||
design-build contracts. In addition to the requirements set | ||
forth in its ordinances, the park district shall advertise a | ||
design-build solicitation at least once in a daily newspaper of | ||
general circulation within the county in which the park | ||
district is located. The date that Phase I submissions by | ||
design-build entities are due must be at least 14 calendar days | ||
after the date the newspaper advertisement for design-build | ||
proposals is first published. The advertisement shall identify | ||
the design-build project, the due date, the place and time for | ||
Phase I submissions, and the place where proposers may obtain a | ||
complete copy of the request for design-build proposals, | ||
including the criteria for evaluation and the scope and | ||
performance criteria. The park district is not precluded from | ||
using other media or from placing advertisements in addition to | ||
the one required under this subsection. | ||
(b) A park district may reject any and all bids and | ||
proposals received and may readvertise for bids or issue a new | ||
request for design-build proposals. | ||
(70 ILCS 1205/8-52 new) | ||
Sec. 8-52. Solicitation of design-build proposals. | ||
(a) When a park district elects to use the design-build | ||
delivery method, it must issue a notice of intent to receive | ||
proposals for the project at least 14 days before issuing the |
request for proposal. The park district shall publish notice of | ||
the request for the design-build proposal in a newspaper of | ||
general circulation within the county in which the park | ||
district is located. The park district shall, if possible, post | ||
plans and specifications in a related construction industry | ||
service publication. A brief description of the proposed | ||
procurement must be included in the notice. The park district | ||
must provide a copy of the request for proposal to any party | ||
requesting a copy. | ||
(b) The request for proposal shall be prepared for each | ||
project and must contain, without limitation, the following | ||
information: | ||
(1) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the
| ||
contract. | ||
(2) The proposed budget for the project, the source
of | ||
funds, and the funds available at the time the request for | ||
proposal is submitted. | ||
(3) Prequalification criteria for design-build
| ||
entities wishing to submit proposals. The park district | ||
shall include, at a minimum, its normal prequalification, | ||
licensing, registration, and other requirements, but | ||
nothing contained in this Section precludes the use of | ||
additional prequalification criteria by the park district. | ||
(4) Material requirements of the contract, including,
| ||
but not limited to, the proposed terms and conditions, | ||
required performance and payment bonds, insurance, and the |
entity's plan to comply with the utilization goals | ||
established by the corporate authorities of the park | ||
district for minority and women business enterprises and to | ||
comply with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | ||
(5) The performance criteria. | ||
(6) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the
| ||
solicitation. | ||
(7) The number of entities to be considered
for the | ||
technical and cost evaluation phase. | ||
(c) The park district may include any other relevant | ||
information that it chooses to supply. The design-build entity | ||
shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of this | ||
documentation in the development of its proposal. | ||
(d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 | ||
calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | ||
proposal. In the event the construction portion of the cost of | ||
the project is estimated to exceed $12,000,000, then the | ||
proposal due date must be at least 28 calendar days after the | ||
date of the issuance of the request for proposal. The park | ||
district shall include in the request for proposal a minimum of | ||
30 days to develop the Phase II submissions after the selection | ||
of entities from the Phase I evaluation is completed. | ||
(70 ILCS 1205/8-53 new) | ||
Sec. 8-53. Development of design-build scope and | ||
performance criteria. |
(a) The park district shall develop, with the assistance of | ||
a licensed design professional or a landscape architect design | ||
professional, as appropriate, a request for proposal, which | ||
shall include scope and performance criteria. The scope and | ||
performance criteria must be in sufficient detail and contain | ||
adequate information to reasonably apprise the qualified | ||
design-build entities of the park district's overall | ||
programmatic needs and goals, including criteria and | ||
preliminary design plans, general budget parameters, schedule, | ||
and delivery requirements. | ||
(b) Each request for proposal shall also include a | ||
description of the level of design to be provided in the | ||
proposals. This description must include the scope and type of | ||
renderings, drawings, and specifications that, at a minimum, | ||
will be required by the park district to be produced by the | ||
design-build entities. | ||
(c) The scope and performance criteria shall be prepared by | ||
a design professional or a landscape architect design | ||
professional, as appropriate, who is an employee of the park | ||
district, or the park district may contract with an independent | ||
design professional selected under the Local Government | ||
Professional Services Selection Act to provide these services. | ||
(d) The design professional or landscape architect design | ||
professional that prepares the scope and performance criteria | ||
is prohibited from participating in any design-build entity | ||
proposal for the project. |
(70 ILCS 1205/8-54 new) | ||
Sec. 8-54. Procedures for design-build selection. | ||
(a) The park district must use a two-phase procedure for | ||
the selection of the successful design-build entity. Phase I of | ||
the procedure shall evaluate and shortlist the design-build | ||
entities based on qualifications, and Phase II will evaluate | ||
the technical and cost proposals. | ||
(b) The park district shall include in the request for | ||
proposal the evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. These | ||
factors are in addition to any prequalification requirements of | ||
design-build entities that the park district has set forth. | ||
Each request for proposal shall establish the relative | ||
importance assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, | ||
including any weighting of criteria to be employed by the park | ||
district. The park district must maintain a record of the | ||
evaluation scoring to be disclosed in the event of a protest | ||
regarding the solicitation. The park district shall include the | ||
following criteria in every Phase I evaluation of design-build | ||
entities: | ||
(1) experience of personnel; | ||
(2) successful experience with similar project types; | ||
(3) financial capability; | ||
(4) timeliness of past performance; | ||
(5) experience with similarly sized projects; | ||
(6) successful reference checks of the firm; |
(7) commitment to assign personnel for the duration of | ||
the project; | ||
(8) qualifications of the entity's consultants; and | ||
(9) ability or past performance in meeting or | ||
exhausting good faith efforts to meet the utilization goals | ||
for minority and women business enterprises established by | ||
the corporate authorities of the park district and in | ||
complying with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights | ||
Act. | ||
The park district may include any additional relevant | ||
criteria in Phase I that it deems necessary for a proper | ||
qualification review. | ||
The park district may not consider any design-build entity | ||
for evaluation or award if the entity has any pecuniary | ||
interest in the project or has other relationships or | ||
circumstances, including, but not limited to, long-term | ||
leasehold, mutual performance, or development contracts with | ||
the park district, that may give the design-build entity a | ||
financial or tangible advantage over other design-build | ||
entities in the preparation, evaluation, or performance of the | ||
design-build contract or that create the appearance of | ||
impropriety. No design-build proposal shall be considered that | ||
does not include an entity's plan to comply with the | ||
requirements concerning minority and women business | ||
enterprises and economically disadvantaged firms established | ||
by the corporate authorities of the park district and with |
Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | ||
Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation, the park | ||
district shall create a shortlist of the most highly qualified | ||
design-build entities. The park district, in its discretion, is | ||
not required to shortlist the maximum number of entities as | ||
identified for Phase II evaluation, except that no less than 2 | ||
design-build entities nor more than 6 may be selected to submit | ||
Phase II proposals. The park district shall notify the entities | ||
selected for the shortlist in writing. This notification shall | ||
commence the period for the preparation of Phase II technical | ||
and cost evaluations. The park district must allow sufficient | ||
time for the shortlist entities to prepare their Phase II | ||
submittals considering the scope and detail requested by the | ||
park district. | ||
(c) The park district shall include in the request for | ||
proposal the evaluating factors to be used in the technical and | ||
cost submission components of Phase II. Each request for | ||
proposal shall establish, for both the technical and cost | ||
submission components of Phase II, the relative importance | ||
assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including any | ||
weighting of criteria to be employed by the park district. The | ||
park district must maintain a record of the evaluation scoring | ||
to be disclosed in the event of a protest regarding the | ||
solicitation. | ||
The park district shall include the following criteria in | ||
every Phase II technical evaluation of design-build entities: |
(1) compliance with objectives of the project; | ||
(2) compliance of proposed services to the request for | ||
proposal requirements; | ||
(3) quality of products or materials proposed; | ||
(4) quality of design parameters; | ||
(5) design concepts; | ||
(6) innovation in meeting the scope and performance | ||
criteria; and | ||
(7) constructability of the proposed project. | ||
The park district may include any additional relevant | ||
technical evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper | ||
selection. | ||
The park district shall include the following criteria in | ||
every Phase II cost evaluation: the total project cost and the | ||
time of completion. The park district may include any | ||
additional relevant technical evaluation factors it deems | ||
necessary for proper selection. The total project cost criteria | ||
weighing factor shall not exceed 30%. | ||
The park district shall directly employ or retain a | ||
licensed design professional or landscape architect design | ||
professional, as appropriate, to evaluate the technical and | ||
cost submissions to determine if the technical submissions are | ||
in accordance with generally accepted industry standards. | ||
Upon completion of the technical submissions and cost | ||
submissions evaluation, the park district may award the | ||
design-build contract to the highest overall ranked entity. |
(70 ILCS 1205/8-55 new) | ||
Sec. 8-55. Small design-build projects. In any case where | ||
the total overall cost of the project is estimated to be less | ||
than $12,000,000, the park district may combine the two-phase | ||
procedure for design-build selection described in Section 8-50 | ||
into one combined step, provided that all the requirements of | ||
evaluation are performed in accordance with Section 8-50. | ||
(70 ILCS 1205/8-56 new) | ||
Sec. 8-56. Submission of design-build proposals. | ||
Design-build proposals must be properly identified and sealed. | ||
Proposals may not be reviewed until after the deadline for | ||
submission has passed as set forth in the request for | ||
proposals. All design-build entities submitting proposals | ||
shall be disclosed after the deadline for submission, and all | ||
design-build entities who are selected for Phase II evaluation | ||
shall also be disclosed at the time of that determination. | ||
Phase II design-build proposals shall include a bid bond in | ||
the form and security as designated in the request for | ||
proposals. Proposals shall also contain a separate sealed | ||
envelope with the cost information within the overall proposal | ||
submission. Proposals shall include a list of all design | ||
professionals, landscape architect design professionals, and | ||
other entities to which any work may be subcontracted during | ||
the performance of the contract. |
Proposals must meet all material requirements of the | ||
request for proposal or they may be rejected as non-responsive. | ||
The park district shall have the right to reject any and all | ||
proposals. | ||
The drawings and specifications of any unsuccessful | ||
design-build proposal shall remain the property of the | ||
design-build entity. | ||
The park district shall review the proposals for compliance | ||
with the performance criteria and evaluation factors set forth | ||
in this Act. | ||
Proposals may be withdrawn before the due date and time for | ||
submissions for any cause. After evaluation begins by the park | ||
district, clear and convincing evidence of error is required | ||
for withdrawal. | ||
(70 ILCS 1205/8-57 new) | ||
Sec. 8-57. Design-build award. The park district may award | ||
a design-build contract to the highest overall ranked entity. | ||
Notice of award shall be made in writing. Unsuccessful entities | ||
shall also be notified in writing. The park district may not | ||
request a best and final offer after the receipt of proposals. | ||
The park district may negotiate with the selected design-build | ||
entity after award but prior to contract execution for the | ||
purpose of securing better terms than originally proposed, | ||
provided that the salient features of the request for proposal | ||
are not diminished.
|
Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | ||
becoming law.
|