Grant Title:
|
|
Proposal Submitted by:
|
|
|
(Agency Name)
|
Rating: In each of the following categories please rate the proposal
according to the information provided in the written submission, with five
being high and one being low; circle the desired rating.
|
Category
|
|
Rating
|
I.
|
Merit of this proposal in
addressing the purpose and criteria for the grant (refer to scope and
standard of services in the Rules and Regulations).
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
a.
|
Narratives
|
|
b.
|
Objectives
|
|
c.
|
Resources/Program Operation
|
|
d.
|
Comprehensiveness
|
|
e.
|
Target Group/Eligibility
|
|
f.
|
Budget
(general review only)
|
II.
|
Ability of the agency to
provide services at a comprehensive single site or adequately coordinate
these services with other community agencies. This should include staff
capabilities (or capabilities to hire appropriate staff), physical facilities
and fiscal management capabilities.
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
III.
|
Level of community support for
project and maximum use of other funding sources.
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
IV.
|
General Comments:
|
|
a.
|
|
|
|
|
b.
|
Overall score of this application
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
2 –
|
|
|
V.
|
Conditions of Award if Funded:
|
|
|
|
Signed:
|
|
Dated:
|
|
MCH
Grant Proposal Review Form
Division
of Family Health
Continuation
Application
|
Grant Title:
|
|
Proposal Submitted by:
|
|
|
(Agency
Name)
|
|
Amount of Assistance Requested
in this Application:
|
Current Fiscal Year Funding
Level:
|
Ratings: In each of the following categories please rate the proposal
according to the information provided in the written submission in the
performance report with five being high and one being low; circle the desired
rating.
|
Category
|
|
Rating
|
I.
|
Previous performance based on
materials provided by program administrator (site review and summary of
previous statistics and fiscal data).
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
II.
|
Merit of this proposal in
addressing the purpose and criteria for the grant (Scope and standard of
services described in the Rules and Regulations).
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
III.
|
Reevaluation of need for
services within the area of service (refer to Rules and Regulations).
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
General Comments:
|
I.
|
Are there particular strengths
or weaknesses in the proposal?
Please elaborate:
|
|
|
|
II.
|
Does this proposed budget need
revision or further explanations?
Please elaborate:
|
|
|
|
Summary:
|
I.
|
Overall rank of of
continuation grants in this category reviewed by this reviewer.
|
II.
|
Overall score for this
continuation application
|
III.
|
Stipulations (if any):
|
IV.
|
Recommended grant award of
$ .
|
|
|
|
Signed:
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Source: Added at 14 Ill. Reg. 11219, effective July 1, 1990)